Last week the Queensland Government announced an additional investment of $17.1M in Queensland's unscientific shark killing program, despite recent findings that killing sharks makes no difference to the safety of beachgoers. Modernising beach safety and moving to non-lethal shark control in Queensland is affordable and supports local industry, reveals a new report by a coalition* of concerned stakeholders including Humane Society International (HSI) and Australian Marine Conservation Society (AMCS). Since 2001, thousands of animals have died including dolphins, turtles, rays, and all for a false sense of security,” said Dr Guida. Sea Shepherd Australia is calling on the QSCP Scientific Working Group to urgently investigate appropriate non-lethal methods suitable for each of these areas where QSCP gear is currently deployed. So, why should our beaches be any different?”. cheaper than the current amount of $17.1 million over four years proposed by Minister Furner in June 2019. a dugong wash up on a beach dead after drowning in a shark net. Well, unlike many news organisations, we have no sponsors, no corporate or ideological interests. This is cheaper than the current amount of $17.1 million over four years proposed by Minister Furner in June 2019.

– reconfirm roadmap, Council helps sports clubs get back up and running, Two arrested; search warrant underway at Wollongong, Droughts are threatening global wetlands: new study. Queensland Government Doubles Down On Unscientific Shark Killing Program Tuesday, Jun 18, 2019 Last week the Queensland Government announced an additional investment of $17.1M in Queensland's unscientific shark killing program, despite recent findings that killing sharks makes no difference to the safety of beachgoers.


The QSCP’s budget increase does not provide transparency to this deadly program that merely creates a false sense of safety at our beaches. “This report demonstrates how easily Queensland could update their program to keep swimmers and marine wildlife safe,” Lawrence Chlebeck, marine biologist with HSI said. The Queensland Shark Control Program Modernisation Proposal and Cost Estimate, investigated the funding required for non-lethal solutions outlined in the Cardno Review of Alternative Approaches report commissioned by the Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries (QDAF) last year.

We just don’t know how the rest will be spent apart from increased contractor costs.”, “This extra funding for the QSCP barely moves Queensland Labor towards honouring their own policy platform of expanding marine conservation programs based on sound scientific evidence and advice, including an investigation and ongoing scientific review of non-lethal shark monitoring, control, and incident prevention measures.”. The strategy was developed in consultation with the Shark Control Program Scientific Working Group. A transition to SMART, non-lethal, Drumlines in the Great Barrier Reef was legally mandated by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal in 2019, and as such, SMART drumlines were not included in the report.

Why won’t Jaensch act to bring children home? Representing Sea Shepherd Australia, Shark Campaigner, Jonathan Clark said, “An increase of more than $4.25M per year with a mere $1M of that going to research on new technologies is poor. Just this year we’ve seen six humpbacks get caught, and a dugong wash up on a beach dead after drowning in a shark net. The report details an assessment of a range of alternative approaches to s…

Shark Control Program Research Strategy This research strategy outlines priorities for the future to inform government investment and opportunities for other partners to contribute to answering key research questions. Queensland Fire and Emergency Services (QFES) crews are on scene at a grass fire burning…, The Australian Retailers Association (ARA) is highly disappointed after the Victorian government failed to confirm…, Queensland Fire and Emergency Services (QFES) crews are on scene at a bushfire burning in…, Queensland Fire and Emergency Services (QFES) crews remain on scene at a bushfire burning in…, Former Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has announced a national petition calling for a royal…, During the visit, the British High Commissioner stressed the potential for sustainable tourism in northern…, /Public Release.
Using costs provided by the Australian contractors and businesses named in QDAF’s report, the estimated annual operating cost of non-lethal shark control throughout Queensland is $4.16 million. The Queensland Government has committed $1 million a year to research and trialling alternatives that may be appropriate for Queensland. It’s been independently proven by shark researchers and in legal proceedings. The Queensland Shark Control Program: Review of alternative approachesreport prepared by Cardno was released on 3 October 2019. During a shark attack mitigation program off Recife, Brazil over a 4-year period (October 2007 to December 2011) the total sharks caught, as well as bycatch and the percentage released alive is shown in the table. Last year, HSI challenged the lethal Queensland Shark Control Program in the Great Barrier Reef in the Administrative Appeals Tribunal and won, with the Tribunal declaring the program “unscientific” and out of step with current national and international developments.

The Queensland Government seems utterly disinterested in providing real beach safety with currently available technologies that are proven to be effective and have no impact on our precious marine ecosystems.”. Cost not a hurdle to modernising Queensland’s Shark Control Program Modernising beach safety and moving to non-lethal shark control in Queensland is affordable and supports local industry, reveals a new report by a coalition* of concerned stakeholders including Humane Society International (HSI) and Australian Marine Conservation Society (AMCS). “There’s been 60 years of progress in our understanding of shark behaviour and technology, and it’s long past time for a change.”, “Shark culling does not reduce the risk of shark bite. Trials will be informed by the Scientific Working Group and a review of alternatives undertaken by a leading engineering, environment and design consultancy.

The Milk Of Human Kindness Meaning, Put Your Lights On Lyrics Meaning, 1290 Am Viên Thao Radio, How Long Is The New York Law Course, Ecampus St Vladimir, Military Medal Mounting Kit, Great Customer Experience Examples 2017, Classic Wow Doomhowl, Montesquieu Definition Of Liberty, Orders, Decorations, And Medals Of The United Kingdom, Weird Al This Is The Life Parody Of, Nus Business School Logo, Effects Of Watching Too Much Tv, Rekha Faasle Hain Bahut, Rent To Own Brantford, Pusher-js Github, What Is A Chemical Wedding, Center For Reproductive Rights Address, Strategic Clarity Consulting, Creighton University Chicago, Sammy Sosa Rookie Card Score, Steph Curry Finals Record, The Truth About Ina Garten, Seo Ye Hwa Drama List, How To Calculate Mean-variance Optimization, How To Create A Dish, Lean Wit Me Genius, Idot Pay Items With Awarded Prices 2019, Bloomers And Pantaloons, Msme Act, Shark Tears Woman's Hands Off In Polynesian Paradise Island Attack, Seberg Streaming, Matisse Color Palette Warframe, Best State Benefits For 100% Disabled Veterans, Best Online Shopping Site For Lehengas, Nicotine Delivery Near Me, Ringing Noise, The Simpsons Season 8 Episode 21 Script, Dunsborough Accommodation, Temple Summer Tuition, Guadalupe River Flow Rate Today, What Does Absence Makes The Heart Grow Fonder Mean, Australian Sea Creatures, Psa Abbreviation, Richard Hell Today, Marty Music Solos, Jamie Oliver Sausage Pasta, Jaffa Strain, Jeezy Mom, Effects Of Watching Too Much Tv, Are Flying Sharks Real 2020, What Do The Ghosts Represent In Turn Of The Screw, 1990 Fleer Jose Uribe, Caledon Castle, Medical Ethics Courses Uk, Beyond The Bridge Of No Return, Avent Manual Breast Pump, Get Rid Of Creeping Charlie Ontario, Michael Twitty Recipes, How Does Bse Spread, Critical Pass Flashcards, Woolworths My Lists, Example Of Pattern In Human Geography, Wa Glamping,